Melting Pot: an evaluation suite for multi-agent reinforcement learning
Existing evaluation suites for multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) do not assess generalization to novel situations as their primary objective (unlike supervised-learning benchmarks). Our contribution, Melting Pot, is a MARL evaluation suite that fills this gap, and uses reinforcement learning to reduce the human labor required to create novel test scenarios. This works because one agent’s behavior constitutes (part of) another agent’s environment. To demonstrate scalability, we have created over 85 unique test scenarios covering a broad range of research topics such as social dilemmas, reciprocity, resource sharing, and task partitioning. We apply these test scenarios to standard MARL training algorithms, and demonstrate how Melting Pot reveals weaknesses not apparent from training performance alone.
Technology deployed in the real world inevitably faces unforeseen challenges. These challenges arise because the environment where the technology was developed differs from the environment where it will be deployed. When a technology transfers successfully we say it generalises. In a multi-agent system, such as autonomous vehicle technology, there are two possible sources of generalisation difficulty: (1) physical-environment variation such as changes in weather or lighting, and (2) social-environment variation: changes in the behavior of other interacting individuals. Handling social-environment variation is at least as important as handling physical-environment variation, however it has been much less studied.
As an example of a social environment, consider how self-driving cars interact on the road with other cars. Each car has an incentive to transport its own passenger as quickly as possible. However, this competition can lead to poor coordination (road congestion) that negatively affects everyone. If cars work cooperatively, more passengers might get to their destination more quickly. This conflict is called a social dilemma.
However, not all interactions are social dilemmas. For instance, there are synergistic interactions in open-source software, there are zero-sum interactions in sports, and coordination problems are at the core of supply chains. Navigating each of these situations requires a very different approach.
Multi-agent reinforcement learning provides tools that allow us to explore how artificial agents may interact with one another and with unfamiliar individuals (such as human users). This class of algorithms is expected to perform better when tested for their social generalisation abilities than others. However, until now, there has been no systematic evaluation benchmark for assessing this.
Here we introduce Melting Pot, a scalable evaluation suite for multi-agent reinforcement learning. Melting Pot assesses generalization to novel social situations involving both familiar and unfamiliar individuals, and has been designed to test a broad range of social interactions such as: cooperation, competition, deception, reciprocation, trust, stubbornness and so on. Melting Pot offers researchers a set of 21 MARL “substrates” (multi-agent games) on which to train agents, and over 85 unique test scenarios on which to evaluate these trained agents. The performance of agents on these held-out test scenarios quantifies whether agents:
- Perform well across a range of social situations where individuals are interdependent,
- Interact effectively with unfamiliar individuals not seen during training,
- Pass a universalisation test: answering positively to the question "what if everyone behaved like that?''
The resulting score can then be used to rank different multi-agent RL algorithms by their ability to generalise to novel social situations.
We hope Melting Pot will become a standard benchmark for multi-agent reinforcement learning. We plan to maintain it, and will be extending it in the coming years to cover more social interactions and generalisation scenarios. Learn more from our GitHub page.